Thursday, March 15, 2012

photo of typical air burst geoablation glaze on hard bedrock at top of Mount Helix park, E San Diego: Rich Murray 2012.03.15
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2012/03/photo-of-typical-air-burst-geoablation.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/98


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: rmforall@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:57 PM
Subject: typical air burst geoablation glaze on hard bedrock at top of Mount Helix park, E San Diego: Rich Murray 2012.03.15
To: Rich Murray

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

Mount Helix public park with white cross and outdoor concrete theater from about 1925 -- excellent access via helical road with parking lot and portapotty, about 2.2 km SE of roads 8 and 125, with similar mounts 1.5 km further SE -- in fact, probably all the mountains for a very long ways have the same evidence -- so I'm just alerting the alert to some nice obvious low hanging fruit...

Mount Helix is .419 km el, .250 km above road 125 at .169 km el about 1 km to W, so it is quite prominent, and has spectacular views.

32.766969   -116.983481   .415 km el.

1.5 m rock just to N of 1 m rock, both pink hard crystalline rock (granite?) with surface glaze a few mm thick that is redbrown and rough (like the surface of a brick) -- a white ballpoint pen provides the scale -- entirely typical of uneroded glazes on broken and rounded tumbled rocks and blocks at altitudes that preclude water erosion, suggesting the possibility of early Holocene surface melting and glazing by a very hot high pressure and density gas jet from an air burst, as simulated at Sandia Labs in recent years by Mark Boslough -- the first of 17 photos I took in my first visit to the site from 3 to 4 pm, Tuesday, March 13, 2012 -- I collected a few pounds of samples, to donate to anyone who can properly study the melts and glazes.

HTC Incredible 3G phone 7 Mpx cam, 1.491 MB jpg,
3264X1952 px, clear blue sky, 3 pm, 4 hours before sunset.

Google Earth view is 2010.08.23, about 10 AM.

Mt. Helix Park Foundation
4901 Mt. Helix Drive
La Mesa, CA 91941
Tracey Stotz 619-741-4363
TStotz@MtHelixPark.org
binannual newsletter, From the Top
total 2011 income $ 140,522


some choice informed creative comments from 202 re wattsupwiththat.com
blog article  New evidence supporting extraterrestrial impact at the
start of the Younger Dryas: Rich Murray 2012.03.13
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2012/03/some-choice-informed-creative-comments.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/96


10 m broken rock hill with black glazes, W of Rancho Alegre Road, S of
Coyote Trail, W of Hwy 14, S of Santa Fe, New Mexico, tour of 50
photos 1 MB size each via DropBox: Rich Murray 2011.07.28 2011.08.03
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011/08/10-m-broken-rock-hill-with-black-glazes.html
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011/08/35479730-106085926-1865-km-el-top-10-m.html
photos 3-5 of 50
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/92


Rich Murray,
MA Boston University Graduate School 1967 psychology,
BS MIT 1964 history and physics,
254-A Donax Avenue, Imperial Beach, CA 91932
rmforall@gmail.com
                       505-819-7388 cell
                       619-623-3468 home  
Skype audio, video rich.murray11

http://RMForAll.blogspot.com
primary archive

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/messages

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rmforall/messages

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/messages
group with 117 members, 1,641 posts in a public archive

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

detailed careful fair critique of most cases of purported impact causes of extinctions, Grzegorz Racki, Silesian U., Poland, 64 p: Rich Murray 2012.03.13

detailed careful fair critique of most cases of purported impact causes of extinctions, Grzegorz Racki, Silesian U., Poland, 64 p:  Rich Murray 2012.03.13
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2012/03/detailed-careful-fair-critique-of-most.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/97

[ I'm grateful to find this posted on

http://cosmictusk.com/tree-falls-in-forest-and-one-hand-claps-science-press-picks-the-new-mexican-black-mat-study/comment-page-1/#comments

as a link given in a comment by Thomas Lee Elifritz
March 8, 2012 at 4:33 pm

I was impressed by how difficult it is to gather and mobilize evidence in this very complex research.

Really courteous, patient, open-minded, detail oriented collaboration is essential.

Grzegorz Racki, like many experts, in this review accepted the recent refutation of the YD impact hypothesis -- I wonder how he will respond to the new wave of confirming evidence. ]

http://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app57/app20110058_acc.pdf 64 pages

This manuscript is a part of a special issue titled
“Thirty odd years after Alvarez’s discovery:
Faunal evolution and principal bio-events of the
Cretaceous Period – recent progress and future
directions” (guest editors: Elena A. Jagt-Yazykowa
and John W.M. Jagt).

The Alvarez impact theory of mass extinction; limits to its applicability and the ‘great expectations syndrome’
GRZEGORZ RACKI
Racki, G. 201X.
The Alvarez impact theory of mass extinction; limits to its applicability and the ‘great expectations syndrome’.
Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 5X (X): xxx–xxx.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2011.0058

[ abstract ]

For the past three decades, the Alvarez impact theory of mass extinction, causally related to catastrophic meteorite impacts, has been recurrently applied to multiple extinction boundaries.

However, these multidisciplinary research efforts across the globe have been largely unsuccessful to date, with one outstanding exception: the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.

The unicausal impact scenario as a leading explanation, when applied to the complex fossil record, has resulted in force fitting of data and interpretations (‘great expectations syndrome’ of Tsujita).

The misunderstandings can be grouped at three successive levels of the testing process, and involve the unreflective application of the impact paradigm:

(i) factual misidentification, i.e., an erroneous or indefinite recognition of the extraterrestrial record in sedimentological, physical and geochemical contexts,

(ii) correlative misinterpretation of the adequately documented impact signals due to their incorrect dating, and

(iii) causal overestimation when the proved impact characteristics are doubtful as a sufficient trigger of a contemporaneous global cosmic catastrophe.

Examples of uncritical belief in the simple cause-effect scenario for the Frasnian–Famennian, Permian–Triassic and Triassic–Jurassic (and the Eifelian–Givetian and Paleocene–Eocene as well) global events include mostly item-1 pitfalls (factual misidentification), with Ir enrichments and shocked minerals frequently misidentified.

Therefore, these mass extinctions are still at the first test level, and only the F–F extinction is potentially seen in the context of item-2, the interpretative step, because of the possible causative link with the Siljan Ring crater (53 km in diameter).

The erratically recognized cratering signature is often marked by large timing and size uncertainties, and item-3, the advanced causal inference, is in fact limited to clustered impacts that clearly predate major mass extinctions.

The multi-impact lag-time pattern is particularly clear in the Late Triassic, when the largest (100-km diameter) Manicouagan crater was possibly concurrent with the end-Carnian extinction (or with the late Norian tetrapod turnover on an alternative time scale).

The relatively small crater sizes and cratonic (crystalline rock basement) setting of these two craters further suggest the strongly insufficient extraterrestrial trigger of worldwide environmental traumas.

However, to discuss the kill potential of impact events in a more robust fashion, their location and timing, vulnerability factors, especially target geology and
palaeogeography in the context of associated climate-active volatile fluxes, should to be rigorously assessed.

The current lack of conclusive impact evidence synchronous with most mass extinctions may still be somewhat misleading due to the predicted large set of undiscovered craters, particularly in light of the obscured record of oceanic impact events.

K e y w o r d s: Bolide impacts, extraterrestrial markers, impact craters, mass extinctions, Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, Triassic–Jurassic boundary, Frasnian–Famennian boundary.

Grzegorz Racki [ racki@us.edu.pl ],
Department of Earth Sciences,
Silesian University,
Będzińska Str. 60, PL-41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland.
Received 9 July 2011, accepted 18 December 2011, available online 24 February 2012.


10 m broken rock hill with black glazes, W of Rancho Alegre Road, S of
Coyote Trail, W of Hwy 14, S of Santa Fe, New Mexico, tour of 50
photos 1 MB size each via DropBox: Rich Murray 2011.07.28 2011.08.03
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011/08/10-m-broken-rock-hill-with-black-glazes.html
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011/08/35479730-106085926-1865-km-el-top-10-m.html
photos 3-5 of 50
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/92

some choice informed creative comments from 202 re wattsupwiththat.com blog article, New evidence supporting extraterrestrial impact at the start of the Younger Dryas: Rich Murray 2012.03.13

some choice informed creative comments from 202 re wattsupwiththat.com
blog article, New evidence supporting extraterrestrial impact at the
start of the Younger Dryas: Rich Murray 2012.03.13
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2012/03/some-choice-informed-creative-comments.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/96

really nice to see so much friendly, cooperative sharing of ideas and evidence !


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/03/12/new-evidence-supporting-extraterrestrial-impact-in-younger-dryas/#comment-921464

New evidence supporting extraterrestrial impact at the start of the
Younger Dryas
Posted on March 12, 2012 by Anthony Watts
202 Responses


Lars Silen says:
March 12, 2012 at 4:57 am

The big problem so far has been where to find some reasonably big
crater(s) that are young enough.
My feeling is that easily identifiable craters are missing because the
impact area was covered by some kilometer of ice.
The result would be seemingly very old craters the result of a billion
years of weathering because the typical thick layers of ejecta are
missing.
I think two areas in SW finland should be checked. Mossala fjaerd is a
crater like formation where broken edges still are sharp, experts say
the crater is of volcanic origin and extremely old.
My view is that what we see is the very bottom of an impact in a 1…2
km thick ice layer.
No ejecta is found because it melted soon after the impact.
The size of the Mossala crater is ca 6 km diameter.
In the Aland area some 40 km towards WNW there is another slightly
smaller crater 5.5 km in diameter.
Again with broken surfaces that still seem fresh.
Some 15 km south of Mossala I have found glazed sea bottom fragments
similar to material found in the old Swedish Siljan krater (dia 50
km).
If there is interest I could create a web page with some pictures.
It is easy to see that two impacts like these would have injected tens
of km^3 of water into the stratospere probably causing an extended
“atomic war” like winter. /Lars Silen, physicist Finland.


Mike McMillan says:
March 12, 2012 at 6:54 am

Lars Silen

Interesting region. You guys took some heavy hits.
Here are a few Google Earth coords:
Mossala 60.299612°  21.382232°
Angskars 60.471579°  21.016164°
Aland 60.140649°  20.124260°
Siljan 61.046054°  14.899703°

Might have to unzoom a bit to see the crater, especially Siljan and Aland.


Lars Silen says:
March 12, 2012 at 1:10 pm

Re feet2thefire and George Tetley:

I made a new web page in English of the Mossala and Ava craters in
archipelago in SW Finland.

http://www.kolumbus.fi/larsil/Mossala_and_Ava_craters.html

Notice that I don’t know what the origin of these formations are,
I think they are fairly recent but obviously I may be wrong.
Comments and possible pointers to articles are very welcome.
The web page also gives a feeling for what Finnish (Arctic) summer looks like.
We live north of 60 deg N!.
/Lars Silen, physicist Finland.



beng says:
March 12, 2012 at 7:10 am

The only two major observed impacts in recorded history are the
Tunguska, Siberia event & the Shumacher-Levy comet impact on Jupiter.
The first was an air-burst of a supposed chondrite meteor, the second
a tidally-broken comet-train, producing a “string” of impacts. From
this it is hard to imagine that such impact characteristics are
unusual -- much more likely they are common.

Simple postulate: Approximately 12,900 yrs ago a comet-train impact
produced shallowly-angled air-burst(s) with multiple in-line impacts
-- in this case stretching from central Mexico north north-east (west
Texas has evidence too) to near, say, ~500 miles north of Lake
Superior directly above, or on the 10,000 ft thick Laurentide
ice-sheet . Terratons of ice were vaporized, or on the edges,
physically blasted onto the surrounding land and into sub-orbital
trajectories. How that would affect areas when it inevitably came back
down is hard to imagine -- but it would be awesome & incredibly
destructive.

The climate change that would occur after this event would also be
hard to imagine, but yet perhaps we have the evidence right in front
-- the YD.



Dennis Cox says:
March 12, 2012 at 9:14 am

Regarding the search for a crater:

In the original 2007 paper titled Evidence for an extraterrestrial
impact 12,900 years ago that contributed to the megafaunal extinctions
and the Younger Dryas cooling, R.B. Firestone et al proposed that a 4
mile wide bolide had broken up in the atmosphere and that most of it
had hit the Laurentide Ice Sheet.

They cited some unpublished data from experiments by Peter Schultz
from Brown U. And where he had done hypervelocity impact experiments
at the NASA Ames Hypervelocity Vertical Gun Range simulating a low
angle hyper velocity impact into ice. Those experiment showed that a
half mile wide bolide coming in at an oblique angle can hit a half
mile thick sheet of ice and leave no crater in the surface beneath
after the ice melts away. Just randomized patterns of surface melting.
Those experiments imply that if there is relevant planetary scarring
from the event anywhere in the Canadian Shield, instead of the shock
metamorphic effects like we see in a normal cratering event. The
remaining scars will consists of hydrothermal blast effects. So those
scars should consist of rocks that were melted under conditions of
extreme heat, and pressure. And in the presence of a lot of water.

My thinking is that if it is possible to get a valid age since melt
from any suspect melt formations, and since the youngest volcanogenic
rocks in the Canadian shield are some dyke formations that are
something like a million years old. Then it should eventually be
possible to confirm planetary scarring somewhere in the area that was
once covered by the Laurentide ice sheet. And whatever that place
looks like now, it won’t be a crater.

The trouble though, is that the nanodiamond bearing impact layer is
found all over North America, and even the rest of the northern
hemisphere.

But that 4 mile wide bolide idea is what got them in trouble. Enter
Mark Boslough, a physicist from Sandia Labs who objected to the
hypothesis as written saying that it would be physically impossible
for a four mile wide bolide to have enough time in the atmosphere to
break up completely, and scatter fragments over a continent sized area
without leaving a good sized crater somewhere. And that’s why “where’s
the crater" became the rallying cry for opponents to the hypothesis.

But this new paper answers Mark’s very valid skepticism by citing the
work of  astronomer W.M. Napier and his paper titled Palaeolithic
extinctions and the Taurid Complex.  Bill Napier’s work show that the
thing was probably the fragments and debris from a large comet that
hit soon after its complete breakup. The new evidence from Mexico
implies that the southwest was a impact zone too. And that almost all
of it produced large aerial bursts. Hence, there is no reason to think
we’ll find a crater anywhere in the southwest either.

Perhaps something different.

The materials in the impact layer describe temps, and pressures, at
the surface that should have been capable of significant melting and
efficient ablation of surface materials. But that brings us to a
paradox in the search for relevant planetary scarring for the event.

Ever since Sir Charles Lyell published ‘The Principles of Geology’
back in the 1830s it has been assumed without question under the
standard uniformitarian/gradualist paradigm that the only conceivable
source of enough heat to melt the surface of the Earth is terrestrial
volcanism. And with the exception of a cratering impact event, no one
has ever imagined that such energies could come from the sky. So that
if there are formations of geo-ablative melt in the southwest impact
zones of the YD event, we can assume that they have already been
located. But they are listed on the geologic maps as volcanogenic.

Folks might note that north of lake Cuitzeo, and extending all the way
up into southwest Texas there are a few hundred thousand cubic miles
of materials lying undisturbed, and in pristine condition in the
Chihuahuan desert that were all emplaced as a fluidized flow like a
pyroclastic flow. And less than 15% has ever been positively
associated with a volcano.

And in high resolution satellite images those orphan pyroclastic
materials present wind-driven patterns of movement, and flow. Like the
debris laden froth, and foam on a storm tossed beach.


Dennis Cox says:
March 13, 2012 at 5:32 am

I’m reading a lot of skepticism expressing alternate causes for the climate changes of the PH transition that don’t involve impact. This healthy skepticism [is] all well and good.

But if those same skeptics are going to speak to the data at hand -- what I haven’t seen yet is a rational explanation for the materials in the sediment core they took from Lake Cuitzeo that doesn’t involve a major impact event. Specifically, the materials in the layer dating to 12,900 Ya.

I’m also reading a lot of unquestioned assumption that any major impact event must involve the formation of a crater somewhere. The Tunguska event of 1908 did not leave a crater because the fireball didn’t reach the ground. Only its blast wave did. So the largest impact event in recorded history was an aerial burst that didn’t produce a crater. There is nothing to indicate airburst events are unusual. And there is also no reason to assume Tunguska was a large example on the grand scale of such things.

Here’s a few short references to think about;

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2268163/boslough_April_16_2009.pdf
The Nature of Airbursts and their Contribution to the Impact Threat,

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2268163/Aerial%20Bursts%20and%20the%20impact%20threat.pdf
Large Aerial Bursts and the Impact Threat, and

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2268163/DesertGlass.pdf
High performance computing provides clues to scientific mystery.

When you consider that a single large ablative airburst can produce planetary scarring that does not bare any resemblance to a crater, but instead is characterized as a melting event. And realize that geologists of the past have never considered that enough heat, and pressure to do such a thing could come from above, then there is a very real possibility that the planetary scarring of the YD event has already been found, and is still in very good condition, but has been mis-defined on the geologic maps [as] volcanic.

Another point to consider is that since the astronomical model this new paper is working from is Cube and Napier’s work on the Taurid complex, then folks might want to start thinking, not just in terms of a single large impact somewhere, but many.

If we are working from that astronomical model, then we should be looking for the planetary scarring of something like 10,000 Tunguska class, and larger, air bursts hitting the northern hemisphere over a period of about an hour as the Earth passed through the debris of the fragmented Taurid progenitor.

Instead of thinking of the YD impact event as the fist of God smashing into the ground at a specific location, it would probably be a better analogy think of it as his hot, and angry, breath burning much of the biomass of the northern hemisphere away down to the last blade of grass.



Larry Ledwick (hotrod) says:
March 12, 2012 at 9:57 am

Pamela Gray says:
March 12, 2012 at 6:36 am

Certainly the dust alone cannot account for the length of the cold
spell. However, the kicked up dust could account for the first couple
years. Still, dust rains out pretty easily, which could happen as a
result of the dust getting kicked up there in the first place. We call
it cloudless rain here in NE Oregon.

It is possible that the event could have overlapped with another
oscillation that was unrelated. We have so many oscillations on
different beats, it seems plausable that they will overlap. Looking
for one cause over such a long period seems a bit short sighted.


Pamela, your observation has an unspoken assumption that the ejecta
dust (or most of it) stayed in the atmosphere or went outside the
atmosphere and then promptly re-entered.

What of the possibility that a significant fraction of the ejecta went
outside the atmosphere and then entered low earth orbit, forming a
dust shell around the planet, that might persist for several hundred
years?

Due to mutual collisions the ejecta material constantly renewing
itself with ever finer and longer lasting small dust, which perhaps
had higher optical thickness than the original.

That would create a situation where the initial impact and atmospheric
dust load caused a prompt cooling, followed by a long period of
diminished top of the atmospheric solar intensity lasting hundreds of
years, which would help maintain the long term cooling for on the
order of 1000 years.

The very fine dust that would remain in orbit would, as I understand
it, gradually change from a uniform shell to a disk and, unless some
mechanism existed to constantly renew its mass, would eventually
go away as solar wind and the tenuous layers of the upper
atmosphere gradually cleaned out the lowest dust.

Once the orbital dust pall converted to a disk it would not have much
effect on solar intensity at the top of the atmosphere. (at some
angles to the sun it could even act as a reflector increasing solar
intensity on the top of the atmosphere).

Do we have any evidence of a vestigial ring system of dust around the earth?

Is it likely that enough dust ejecta would go into low earth orbit
with orbital decay times in the multi-century time range?

Larry



feet2thefire says:
March 12, 2012 at 10:14 am

@beng 7:10 am:

The only two major observed impacts in recorded history are the
Tunguska, Siberia event & the Shumacher-Levy comet impact on Jupiter.
The first was an air-burst of a supposed chondrite meteor, the second
a tidally-broken comet-train, producing a “string” of impacts.
From this it is hard to imagine that such impact characteristics are
unusual -- much more likely they are common.


Google “Rio Carto” and pick out the hits having to do with impacts.
These are impact craters that are accepted as real (they are on the
international database as meteor impacts, though a vocal skeptical
group argues they are aeloian – wind – formed).
They are from multiple very-low-trajectory (under 15°) impactors, many
are miles long, and all are VERY long ellipses.
Most sources will refer to about ten craters, but there is a large
field to the SSW of hundreds upon hundreds of them, all with the
approximate long-axis azimuth of about 210°.

And the accepted date?

The Imperial College London at http://tiny.cc/sth2aw puts them at less
than 5,000 years ago.
With that one and Tunguska, astronomers who tell us big impacts only
happen every 100kya are stroking us.
Indigenous accounts suggest even more often than that. 536AD is a
possible impact year.

Steve Garcia



Hoser says:
March 12, 2012 at 10:32 am

The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
David Bressan on Monday, April 25, 2011

http://historyofgeology.fieldofscience.com/2011/04/younger-dryas-impact-hypothesis.html

A Catastrophe of Comets

http://craterhunter.wordpress.com/tag/younger-dryas-impact/
http://craterhunter.wordpress.com/the-planetary-scaring-of-the-younger-dryas-impact-event/california-melt/

It seems hard to argue with this info.



Myrrh says:
March 12, 2012 at 4:39 pm

Re floods and dust:
http://www.grahamkendall.net/Unsorted_files-2/A312-Frozen_Mammoths.txt

There’s a lot of muck in this. If what’s being said here about
quick-frozen not cold-adapted mamoths and tropical forests is
indicative of the conditions which prevailed at the onset of the
Younger Dryas then the event was cataclysmic on a world greatly hotter
than we are in now, that perhaps would still be this if the Younger
Dryas hadn’t happened:

“Second, the well-preserved mammoths and rhinoceroses must have
been completely frozen soon after death or their soft, internal
parts would have quickly decomposed. Guthrie has observed that “an
unopened animal continues to decompose after a fresh kill, even at
very cold temperatures, because the thermal inertia of its body is
sufficient to sustain microbial and enzyme activity as long as the
carcass is completely covered with an insulating pelt and the
torso remains intact.”44 Since mammoths had such large reservoirs
of heat, the freezing temperatures must have been extremely low.

Finally, their bodies were buried and protected from predators,
including birds and insects. But burial could not have occurred if
the ground were frozen as it is today. Again, this implies a major
climate change, but now we can see that it must have changed
suddenly. How were these huge animals quickly frozen and
buried almost exclusively in muck, a dark soil containing
decomposed animal and vegetable matter?

Muck. Muck is a major geological mystery. It covers one-seventh of
the earth’s land surface all surrounding the Arctic Ocean. Muck
occupies treeless, generally flat terrain, with no surrounding
mountains from which the muck could have eroded. Russian
geologists have in some places drilled through 4,000 feet of muck
without hitting solid rock. Where did so much eroded material come
from?

Oil prospectors, drilling through Alaskan muck, have “brought up
an 18-inch long chunk of tree trunk from almost 1,000 feet below
the surface. It wasn’t petrified - just frozen.”45 The nearest
forests are hundreds of miles away. Elsewhere, Williams describes
similar discoveries in Alaska:

Though the ground is frozen for 1,900 feet down from the surface
at Prudhoe Bay, everywhere the oil companies drilled around this
area they discovered an ancient tropical forest. It was in frozen
state, not in petrified state. It is between 1,100 and 1,700 feet
down. There are palm trees, pine trees, and tropical foliage in
great profusion. In fact, they found them lapped all over each
other, just as though they had fallen in that position.46

How were trees buried under a thousand feet of hard, frozen
ground? We are faced with the same series of questions that we
first saw with the frozen mammoths. Again, we are driven to the
conclusion that there was a sudden and dramatic change in climate
accompanied by rapid burial in muck, now frozen solid.”



feet2thefire says:
March 12, 2012 at 8:04 pm

@John 6:39 pm:

“Why big game? Because mammoth tusks were found at the various Alaska
sites and were mined in vast quantity in the late 1800s from a small
island in the East Siberian Sea. Unless herds of Siberian Mammoth
decided it was the place to die, someone either herded them there or
dragged the tusks to that location.”

I trust that last was tongue-in-cheek, but even if not, it is a new
perspective for me. Those two possibilities never occurred to me, but
they are as good as mine. Which doesn’t say much!

…Yeah, those mammoth skeletons – much more than just tusks, as you
certainly know – were not just on one island, but on the whole of the
Liakhov and the New Siberian Islands, plus/including Wrangel where the
mini mammoths survived a bit longer, those islands – just how or why
did those mammoths end up there? Especially the Berskova one with the
buttercups in its stomach. Buttercups don’t grow there, and there
isn’t enough vegetable matter to pee on, so what did they eat – herded
or not? If you figure it out, then tell me. My old Plan B backup
explanation was a polar shift, which is about the only explanation
that doesn’t dispute the facts of the mammoths and their tummies – but
it disputes everything else we know , or think we know.

Berskova wasn’t on those islands, but the principle remains your
question: WTF were they bloody doing up there? When mammoth’s hair is
NOT designed for cold, when mammoth remains are ALSO found in Mexico,
when mammoths in ASIA died off at the same time as the ones in N.A. –
what can possibly have been going on back then? Did their being there
have any connection to the extinction event itself – no matter whether
climate or Clovis overkill or comet? Occam’s razor fails us. No simple
explanation exists. Even Holmes’ deduction fails us. I think we don’t
have enough facts to ask the right question. But yours are as good as
mine or anybody else’s.

But are you ready for this?… Mammoths weren’t the only big skeletons
found on the New Siberian and Liakhov Islands.

On Kotelnoi Island (one of the New Siberian Islands) “neither trees,
nor shrubs, nor bushes, exist. . . and yet the bones of elephants,
rhinoceroses, buffaloes, and horses are found in this icy wilderness
in numbers which defy all calculations.” [Whitley, Journal of the
Philosophical Society of Great Britain, XII (1910), pg 56.

One must first credit Whitley with knowing the difference between
horse bones and ‘elephants’ – which latter I assume are mammoths.
Rhinos and buffaloes, too – if for no other reason than scale. The
real weird one is rhinos! The nearest rhinos now are south of the
Himalayas. NO ONE would suggest those rhinos were herded up to those
islands, nor that they happened to wander there while foraging – not
then the nearest forage for them is about 1,000 to the south.

Whatever we try to assign the exitnction to, climate or Clovis man or
impactor, it still doesn’t explain what the heck they were doing there
in the first place. And if Clovis man killed ‘em all in N.A., who
killed them all in Siberia????? Every answer is insufficient.



Steve Garcia
feet2thefire says:
March 12, 2012 at 8:22 pm

@John -
Accounts from early expeditions exist, if not exactly journals. In
1829 German scientist G.A. Erman went there to measure the magnetic
field. Here is some of what he said:

In New Siberia on the declivities facing the south, lie hills 250 or
300 feet high, formed of driftwood, the ancient origin of which, as
well as the fossil wood of the tundras, anterior to the history of the
Earth in its present state, strikes at once even the most uneducated
of hunters. . . . Other hills on the same island, and on Kotelnoi,
which lies further to the west, are heaped to an equal height with
skeletons of pachyderms [elephants, rhinoceroses], bisons [sic], etc’,
which are cemented together by frozen sand as well as by strata and
veins of ice. . . . On the summit of the hills they [the trunks of
trees] lie flung upon one another in the wildest disorder, forced
upright in spite of gravitation, and with their tops broken off or
crushed, as if they had been thrown there with great violence from the
south on a bank, and there heaped up.”

And Edward von Toll visited from 1885 to 1902, and

found them [wood hills] to cinsist of carbonized trunks of trees, with
impressions of leaves and fruits.”

On another island Toll found mammoth bones and other bones, plus
fossilized trees with leaves and cones, making him to write,

This striking discovery proves that in the days when the mammoths and
rhinoceroses lived in northern Siberia,, these desolate islands were
covered with great forests, and bore luxuriant vegetation.”

Scary, isn’t it??? Whatever killed the mammoths seems to have also
killed the trees – and not only killed them but swept the islands
clean (as it is today) and piled the trees and bones high into hills,
literally. It certainly wasn’t climate change. And Clovis man was a
LONG way off in the USA and Mexico. Clovis spears were pretty high
tech for their day, but. . .

Steve Garcia


feet2thefire says:
March 13, 2012 at 10:56 am

John from CA 7:47 am:

I don’t have copies, but look these up on Google Scholar:

1. D. Gath Whitley, “The Ivory Islands in the Arctic Ocean,” Journal of the Philosophical Society of Great Britain, XII (1910)

2. J.D. Dana, Manual of Geology (4th ed.; 1894), pg 1007

3. F. Wrangel, Narrative of an Expedition to Siberia and the Polar Sea (1841) [wording may not be quite correct - see following...]

(Wikipedia) An account of the physical observations during his first journey was published in German (Berlin, 1827), and also in German extracts from Wrangel’s journals, Reise laengs der Nordküste von Sibirien und auf dem Eismeere in den Jahren 1820-1824 (2 vols., Berlin, 1839), which was translated into English as Wrangell’s Expedition to the Polar Sea (2 vols., London, 1840). The complete report of the expedition appeared as “Otceschewie do Sjewernym beregam Sibiri, po Ledowitomm More” (2 vols., St. Petersburg, 1841), and was translated into French with notes by Prince Galitzin, under the title Voyage sur les côtes septentrionales de la Sibérie et de la mer glaciale (2 vols., 1841). From the French version of the complete report an English one was made under the title A Journey on the Northern Coast of Siberia and the Icy Sea (2 vols., London, 1841).

This is the Wrangel for whom the island in the E Arctic Ocean is named, the one with the mini mammoths.

Have fun with that one!

4. G. A. Erman, Travels in Siberia (1848) [that is all I have]

Have fun finding them John!

For explorations, the older the source the better.

Steve Garcia



Larry Ledwick (hotrod ) says:
March 13, 2012 at 2:40 pm

I think some are jumping to an unwarranted conclusion when they assert that the mammoths must have been flash frozen. They only needed to be quickly cooled to about 40 deg F or below (refrigerator temperature) then they could have been slowly frozen over hours or days. One core body temperatures chill to near refrigerator temperatures, decomposition slows dramatically to near zero. There is plenty of time for a sudden cold snap or strong cold winds to then freeze the animal in place. If this happens at a time of major climatic change where that location becomes a year around snow field the animal could gradually sink to the bottom of the snow, then over time sink into the underlying muck as the ground undergoes brief partial thawing during the summer melt.

Possible explanations would include, an animal browsing in a wind blown clear area right next to a large snow drift and having the snow drift suddenly slump (small avalanche) instantly burying the animal in soft snow, then the rapidly chilled animal slowly freezing over the next few days as another storm moves in. Wet snow avalanches set like concrete when the snow stops moving, the animal would suffocate in a matter of minutes then freeze.

Similar, to the above the animal browsing near a frozen over melt water pond and breaking through the ice into several feet of ice cold water and muck, to be slowly frozen and buried as the winter progressed.

A browsing animal moving from wind blown clear areas across a deep snow drift with a strong frozen snow crust breaks through the crust and sinks into very deep snow and is instantly buried when his trashing motions cause the snow to collapse in on him.

For similar examples look no further than spring cross country skiers who venture onto unstable slope after a wind storm and trigger a small avalanche to be buried and not found until the spring thaw weeks or months later.

An animal does not need to be buried deeply to be killed by a snow slump. A boy I went to high school with was killed in a small avalanche my junior year, he was knocked down by a small avalanche and buried face down under only 6 inches of snow.

A small child was killed in a small avalanche in his own driveway here in Colorado years ago, while playing when a large pile of snow slumped and buried him.

Lets not look for circumstances that defy logic when very mundane possibilities could easily explain the situation.

Larry


10 m broken rock hill with black glazes, W of Rancho Alegre Road, S of
Coyote Trail, W of Hwy 14, S of Santa Fe, New Mexico, tour of 50
photos 1 MB size each via DropBox: Rich Murray 2011.07.28 2011.08.03
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011/08/10-m-broken-rock-hill-with-black-glazes.html
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011/08/35479730-106085926-1865-km-el-top-10-m.html
photos 3-5 of 50
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/92

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

"YD impact debris across more than 10% of the planet" -- nanodiamonds in Lake Cuitzeo, Mexico, James Kennett and 15 coworkers, from 12.9 Ka impact event -- link to free full text of PNAS report: Rich Murray 2012.03.06

"YD impact debris across more than 10% of the planet" -- nanodiamonds in Lake Cuitzeo, Mexico, James Kennett and 15 coworkers, from 12.9 Ka impact event -- link to free full text of PNAS report: Rich Murray 2012.03.06
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2012/03/yd-impact-debris-across-more-than-10-of.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/95


"Based upon astrophysical observations and modeling,
Napier (48) proposed that YDB impact markers were produced
when Earth encountered a dense trail of material from a large
already fragmented comet.

His model predicts cluster airbursts
and/or small cratering impacts that could account for the wide
distribution of YD impact debris across more than 10% of the
planet, including Cuitzeo."  [ PNAS report ]

Lake Cuitzeo   0.8--2.2 m deep,
19.940001   -101.140006   1.833 km el,
about 300--400 km^2, ~ 250 km NWW of Mexico City

http://cosmictusk.com/

[ George Howard blog ]

NOTE:  This post will be “stuck” to the top of the page for the time being.
Related new material such as news articles and observations will be blogged subsequent to this post but will appear below.

The old “Drudge Siren” is getting quite a 1st quarter work out.
And from what I hear it is only the beginning.

West, Kennett, Bunch and nearly a dozen new experts from multiple disciplines are publishing a fundamental evidence-based challenge to critics of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis this week in PNAS.

Evidence from central Mexico supporting the Younger Dryas extraterrestrial impact hypothesis

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/03/01/1110614109.abstract

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/03/01/1110614109.full.pdf+html

[ extracts from text at end of this post ]

Published online before print March 5, 2012,
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110614109
PNAS March 5, 2012
Free via Open Access: OA
Show PDF in full window
OA Abstract
» Full Text (PDF)
Full Text + SI (Combined PDF)
Supporting Information

I.I.-A., J.L.B., G.D.-V., H.-C.L., T.E.B., A.W., S.X., and W.S.W. designed research;
I.I.-A., J.L.B., G.D.-V., H.-C.L., T.E.B., J.H.W., J.C.W., A.W., S.X., E.K.R., C.R.K., and W.S.W. performed research;
I.I.-A., J.L.B., G.D.-V., H.-C.L., P.S.D., T.E.B., J.H.W., J.C.W., R.B.F., A.W., J.P.K., C.M., S.X., E.K.R., and W.S.W. analyzed data;
and I.I.-A., J.L.B., G.D.-V., P.S.D., R.B.F., A.W., J.P.K., and C.M. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

† Dates in calendar years before present, unless noted; ka ¼ kiloannum, or 1,000 calendar years

‡ Andronikov AV, Lauretta DS, Andronikva IE, Maxwell RJ,
On the possibility of a late Pleistocene, extraterrestrial impact:
LA-ICP-MS analysis of the black mat and Usselo Horizon samples,
74th Annual Meteoritical Society Meeting, August 8–12, 2011, London, UK,
Supplement, #5008.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jbischoff@usgs.gov

This article contains supporting information online at
www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1110614109/-/DCSupplemental
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1110614109
PNAS Early Edition ∣ 1 of 10
GEOLOGY PNAS PLUS

Isabel Israde-Alcántara a,
James L. Bischoff b, 1,
Gabriela Domínguez-Vázquez c,
Hong-Chun Li d,
Paul S. DeCarli e,
Ted E. Bunch f,
James H. Wittke f,
James C. Weaver g,
Richard B. Firestone h,
Allen West i,
James P. Kennett j,
Chris Mercer k,
Sujing Xie l,
Eric K. Richman m,
Charles R. Kinzie n,
and Wendy S. Wolbach n,

a Departamento de Geología y Mineralogía, Edif. U-4.
Instituto de Investigaciones Metalúrgicas,
Universidad Michoacana de San Nicólas de Hidalgo,
C. P. 58060, Morelia, Michoacán, México;

b US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, 94025;

c Facultad de Biología,
Universidad Michoacana de San Nicólas Hidalgo
C. P. 58060, Morelia, Michoacán, México;

d Department of Geosciences,
National Taiwan University, Taipei 106,
Taiwan, Republic of China;

e SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 94025;

f Geology Program,
School of Earth Science and Environmental Sustainability,
Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff AZ 86011;

g Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;

h Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720;

i GeoScience Consulting, Dewey, AZ 86327;

j Department of Earth Science and Marine Science Institute,
University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;

k National Institute for Materials Science,
1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan;

l CAMCOR High Resolution and MicroAnalytical Facilities,
University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403;

m Materials Science Institute,
University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403;

and n Department of Chemistry, DePaul University,
Chicago, IL 60614

Edited* by Steven M. Stanley, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI,
and approved January 31, 2012 (received for review July 13, 2011)

We report the discovery in Lake Cuitzeo in central Mexico of a black, carbon-rich, lacustrine layer, containing nanodiamonds, microspherules, and other unusual materials that date to the early Younger Dryas and are interpreted to result from an extraterrestrial impact.

These proxies were found in a 27-m-long core as part of an interdisciplinary effort to extract a paleoclimate record back through the previous interglacial.

Our attention focused early on an anomalous, 10-cm-thick, carbon-rich layer at a depth of 2.8 m that dates to 12.9 ka and coincides with a suite of anomalous coeval environmental and biotic changes independently recognized in other regional lake sequences.

Collectively, these changes have produced the most distinctive boundary layer in the late Quaternary record.

This layer contains a diverse, abundant assemblage of impact-related markers, including nanodiamonds, carbon spherules, and magnetic spherules with rapid melting/quenching textures, all reaching synchronous peaks immediately beneath a layer containing the largest peak of charcoal in the core.

Analyses by multiple methods demonstrate the presence of three allotropes of nanodiamond:
n-diamond, i-carbon, and hexagonal nanodiamond (lonsdaleite), in order of estimated relative abundance.

This nanodiamond-rich layer is consistent with the Younger Dryas boundary layer found at numerous sites across North America, Greenland, and Western Europe.

We have examined multiple hypotheses to account for these observations and find the evidence cannot be explained by any known terrestrial mechanism.

It is, however, consistent with the Younger Dryas boundary impact hypothesis postulating a major extraterrestrial impact involving multiple airburst(s) and and/or ground impact(s) at 12.9 ka.

UPDATE #4:  Space.com has a piece with some quotes from Ted Bunch.

UPDATE #3:  Orange County a register has nice write-up with some new quotes from Jim Kennett.

UPDATE #2:  See post below for breaking article from Popular Science on the new evidence from Mexico

UPDATE #1: The paper is published and unrestricted on the PNAS website here, and also below.

http://cosmictusk.com/ucsb-press-release/#comments

http://www.ia.ucsb.edu/pa/display.aspx?pkey=2662

PRESS RELEASE

Study Jointly Led by UCSB Researcher Supports Theory of Extraterrestrial Impact

March 5, 2012

(Santa Barbara, Calif.) -- A 16-member international team of researchers that includes James Kennett, professor of earth science at UC Santa Barbara, has identified a nearly 13,000-year-old layer of thin, dark sediment buried in the floor of Lake Cuitzeo in central Mexico.
The sediment layer contains an exotic assemblage of materials, including nanodiamonds, impact spherules, and more, which, according to the researchers, are the result of a cosmic body impacting Earth.
These new data are the latest to strongly support of a controversial hypothesis proposing that a major cosmic impact with Earth occurred 12,900 years ago at the onset of an unusual cold climatic period called the Younger Dryas.
The researchers' findings appear today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Conducting a wide range of exhaustive tests, the researchers conclusively identified a family of nanodiamonds, including the impact form of nanodiamonds called lonsdaleite, which is unique to cosmic impact.
The researchers also found spherules that had collided at high velocities with other spherules during the chaos of impact.
Such features, Kennett noted, could not have formed through anthropogenic, volcanic, or other natural terrestrial processes.
"These materials form only through cosmic impact," he said.

The data suggest that a comet or asteroid -- likely a large, previously fragmented body, greater than several hundred meters in diameter -- entered the atmosphere at a relatively shallow angle.
The heat at impact burned biomass, melted surface rocks, and caused major environmental disruption.
"These results are consistent with earlier reported discoveries throughout North America of abrupt ecosystem change, megafaunal extinction, and human cultural change and population reduction," Kennett explained.

The sediment layer identified by the researchers is of the same age as that previously reported at numerous locations throughout North America, Greenland, and Western Europe.
The current discovery extends the known range of the nanodiamond-rich layer into Mexico and the tropics.
In addition, it is the first reported for true lake deposits.

In the entire geologic record, there are only two known continent-wide layers with abundance peaks in nanodiamonds, impact spherules, and aciniform soot. These are in the 65-million-year-old Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary layer that coincided with major extinctions, including the dinosaurs and ammonites; and the Younger Dryas boundary event at 12,900 years ago, closely associated with the extinctions of many large North American animals, including mammoths, mastodons, saber-tooth cats, and dire wolves.

"The timing of the impact event coincided with the most extraordinary biotic and environmental changes over Mexico and Central America during the last approximately 20,000 years, as recorded by others in several regional lake deposits," said Kennett.
"These changes were large, abrupt, and unprecedented, and had been recorded and identified by earlier investigators as a ‘time of crisis.' "

Other scientists contributing to the research include
Isabel Israde-Alcántara and Gabriela Dominguez-Vásquez of the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicólas de Hidalgo;
James L. Bischoff of the U.S. Geological Survey;
Hong-Chun Li of National Taiwan University;
Paul S. DeCarli of SRI International;
Ted E. Bunch and James H. Wittke of Northern Arizona University;
James C. Weaver of Harvard University;
Richard B. Firestone of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory;
Allen West of GeoScience Consulting;
Chris Mercer of the National Institute for Materials Science;
Sujing Zie and Eric K. Richman of the University of Oregon, Eugene;
and Charles R. Kinzie and Wendy S. Wolbach of DePaul University.

http://www.ia.ucsb.edu/pa/image.aspx?pkey=2662&Position=1
James Kennett

http://www.ia.ucsb.edu/pa/image.aspx?pkey=2662&Position=2
† Center image: The ‘tectonic' effects of the collision of one spherule with another during the cosmic impact.

http://www.ia.ucsb.edu/pa/image.aspx?pkey=2662&Position=3
†† Bottom image: Images of single and twinned nanodiamonds show the atomic lattice framework of the nanodiamonds. Each dot represents a single atom.

Copyright © The Regents of the University of California, All Rights Reserved.
UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106  (805) 893-8000


http://cosmictusk.com/tree-falls-in-forest-and-one-hand-claps-science-press-picks-the-new-mexican-black-mat-study/

This just in from Popular Science, link here.

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-03/space-rock-impact-could-have-caused-ancient-cooldown-new-evidence-says

By Rebecca Boyle,  Posted 03.05.2012 at 3:25 pm,  9 Comments

Massive Extraterrestrial Rock Hit Earth 13 Millennia Ago, According to Nano-Evidence

About 13,000 years ago, a chunk of a comet or asteroid hurtled into the atmosphere at a shallow angle, superheating the atmosphere around it as it careened toward the surface. The air grew hot enough to ignite plant material and melt rock below the object’s flight path. Within a few microseconds, atmospheric oxygen was consumed and the freed carbon atoms condensed into nanodiamond crystals.

An air shock followed several seconds later, lofting these nanodiamonds and other carbon particles into the atmosphere, spreading them around. Mega mammals starved, unable to forage on the scorched earth, and human populations dwindled. The shock on the atmosphere was enough to lower global temperatures for a thousand years.

This is according to a new study of ancient Mexican nanodiamonds, and it’s another salvo in a longstanding ancient-climate dispute. The study bolsters the controversial argument that an asteroid impact might have chilled the planet during the Younger Dryas, an abrupt and very short cold interval that started about 12,900 years back.

Paleo-climatologists have been arguing about the genesis of this period for half a decade now. Some hypothesize it was the result of collapsing North American ice sheets, which disrupted the heat conveyor of the North Atlantic. Others argue it was because melting ice changed the landscape, which in turn changed the jet stream. And another theory, first posed in 2007, holds that something hit the Earth and set North America on fire. This theory was proposed after a study of ancient sediments in multiple sites, in which geologists noticed an organic-rich layer of material called a “black mat.” Later, researchers led by University of Oregon archaeologist Douglas Kennett found high concentrations of nanodiamonds -- a material associated with high-temperature collisions of material.

The theory soon drew a firestorm of criticism, with a concurrent paper dismissing the nanodiamond results as a false positive. The nanodiamond theory was all but ignored by mid-2011 after many groups of scientists could neither corroborate nor replicate the results. Now comes Isabel Israde-Alcántara et al., writing in the same journal that published the nanodiamond refutation.

This time, the researchers studied a different location -- a lake in central Mexico instead of Greenland -- and used a different set of techniques to take their measurements. The team studied a 10-centimeter-thick, carbon-rich layer dating to 12,900 years ago, which contained nanodiamonds, carbon spherules and other material. Israde-Alcántara and colleagues at the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicólas de Hidalgo in Mexico and the U.S. Geological Survey report their results in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The sediment layer came from a a 27-meter-long core sample drilled from Lake Cuitzeo as part of a paleoclimate study. The team focused on several microparticles they attribute to widespread burning -- such as carbon particulates -- and nanodiamonds, which they measured using even more precise techniques than Kennett et al. two years ago.

These particles can’t be explained by any terrestrial mechanisms, the authors say. They rule out a rain shower of cosmic particles; wildfires; volcanism; human-related activities; and even particle misidentification (like finding fool’s nanodiamonds). They say a cosmic impact is the only viable hypothesis.

This is surely not the last word on this subject, however. We will stay on top of the nanodiamond hunt.


http://www.ocregister.com/news/impact-343336-kennett-years.html

Orange County Register NEWS

Published: March 6, 2012 Updated: 11:32 a.m.

Did cosmic impact kill the mammoths?

By PAT BRENNAN / ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER

A series of strikes by an asteroid or comet might solve a prehistoric mystery: Why did a long list of creatures, from mammoths and saber-toothed cats to horses and camels, vanish suddenly from North America nearly 13,000 years ago?
Relying on a meticulous analysis of fragments, including tiny diamonds of submicroscopic size, from a dark layer of sediment in a Mexican lake, a new study suggests that large objects from space might have caused the continental-sized catastrophe.

And while the impact is "dinky" compared to the massive strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, it would have been enough to profoundly alter the course of evolution in the Americas.
"This is the standout event in terms of environmental and biotic change," said James Kennett, an earth science professor at UC Santa Barbara and an author of the new study. "All the horses in North America, all the camels, the mastodon, short-faced bear, giant beaver, dire wolf, saber-toothed cats -- the disappearances converge very abruptly at or close to 12.9 (thousand years ago)."
Humans, too, suffered steep population declines, with the Clovis culture seeming to vanish, along with human presence in California, during a sharp cooling episode known as the Younger Dryas.
"It's a bit of a puzzle why the cooling even occurred," Kennett said. "We argued the cooling occurred as a result of the impact."
Kennett and an international, 16-member team examined "nanodiamonds" that form only during cosmic impacts, along with "impact spherules" that had crashed together at high speed and remained fused -- again an effect seen only in impacts from space bodies.
And, while there are hints of a crater in the Gulf of St. Lawrence that might be related to the event, Kennett says his team's hypothesis does not require an impact crater.
Instead, the strikes -- perhaps a series of strikes from a comet or asteroid that had broken up -- could have taken place above the ground, much like the Tunguska event over Siberia in 1908 that leveled trees across 800 square miles.
Evidence of the strike, or strikes, is scattered across western Europe as well as North and South America, though the European material is made up of nanodiamonds so light they could have been carried there by wind.
The material analyzed by the team came from Lake Cuitzeo in central Mexico.
"It's really a cometary cloud that intersected Earth at that time," Kennett said. "That's our hypothesis. We're finding, as we do more work on this, essentially the larger it's getting."
Relying on detailed geochemistry as well as careful analysis of the lattice-like structure inside the nanodiamonds, the team was able to rule out other possible origins for the material -- volcanoes or stray bits falling into the atmosphere from space.
While Kennett is careful to point out that the new study includes only evidence of the extraterrestrial impact, and makes no direct link to animal extinctions, the match between the timing of the many disappearances of large creatures and the timing of the impact is extraordinary.
It even includes the pygmy mammoths that once inhabited California's Channel Islands.
"The youngest known pygmy mammoth is dated to 12.9 (thousand years ago)," he said. "They go right up to 12.9, then they're gone."
More familiar creatures such as grizzly bears and 3lk might have reinvaded the continent after the cosmic impacts. But compared to the spectacular period before, the later North American fauna begins to look a little impoverished.
"What we have left is wimpish compared with Africa," Kennett said. "It's sad. But we lost all these wonderful animals, including the giant sloths."
The study, one of a series on the impacts 12,900 years ago, was published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.


http://www.space.com/14793-comet-earth-impact-younger-dryas.html?utm_content=SPACEdotcom&utm_campaign=seo%2Bblitz&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social%2Bmedia

Comet May Have Collided With Earth 13,000 Years Ago
by Clara Moskowitz, SPACE.com Assistant Managing Editor
Date: 06 March 2012 Time: 06:05 AM ET

Central Mexico’s Lake Cuitzeo contains melted rock formations and nanodiamonds that suggest a comet impacted Earth around 12,900 years ago, scientists say.
CREDIT: Israde et al. (2012)

New evidence supports the idea that a huge space rock collided with our planet about 13,000 years ago and broke up in Earth's atmosphere, a new study suggests.

This impact would have been powerful enough to melt the ground, and could have killed off many large mammals and humans. It may even have set off a period of unusual cold called the Younger Dryas that began at that time, researchers say.

The idea that Earth experienced an asteroid or comet impact at the start of the Younger Dryas has been controversial, in part because there is no smoking-gun impact crater left behind as with other known events in our planet's past. But researchers say it's common for space rocks to disintegrate in the heat of a planet's atmosphere before they can reach the ground.

The scientists first reported their suspicions about the event in 2007. Now, they say, a new site in Central Mexico's Lake Cuitzeo displays telltale signs of an impact, including melted rock formations called spherules and microscopic diamonds that could only have formed under extreme temperatures.

The researchers, led by Isabel Israde-Alcántara of Mexico's Universidad Michoacana de San Nicólas de Hidalgo, published their findings online March 5 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

This scanning electron microscope image shows a magnetic impact spherule likely to have been created by an asteroid or comet impact 12,900 years ago, researchers say.
CREDIT: Israde et al. (2012)

Buried evidence

"If you don't have a crater, you're a little bit lost," said space scientist Ted Bunch of Northern Arizona University, a member of the research team. "Here what we have is something similar to an aerial bomb blast. With these aerial bursts, with time all the evidence is wiped away unless it's buried." [Best Close Encounters of the Comet Kind]

In addition to the Mexican site, the scientists have found signs of an impact in Canada, the United States, Russia, Syria and various sites in Europe. And all of these bits of evidence were found buried in a thin layer of rock that dates to precisely 12,900 years ago.

"If you have an event like this in a 1- or 2-inch layer that dates to exactly the same age over a very large area, and you have high-temperature materials and nanodiamonds in there, the evidence pretty well points to an event that as pretty disastrous," Bunch told SPACE.com.

This wouldn't have been the only aerial impact event ever to hit Earth. Scientists think a space rock exploded over Siberia in 1908, flattening 500,000 acres (2,000 square kilometers) of forest in what's known as the Tunguska event.

Heat flash

If a comet, which would have been traveling at about 30 miles per second, impacted Earth's atmosphere, it would have created a flash of extreme heat reaching about 3,000 to 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit (1,600 to 2,200 degrees Celsius).

In addition to melting the ground, such temperatures would have proven cataclysmic to many kinds of life.

At the same time that the impact may have taken place -- 12,900 years ago -- Earth was beginning a mini ice age. It is known that many large animals, such as the mammoth and the saber-toothed cat, did not survive this age. There's even evidence of a population decline in humans living in North America at the time, called the Clovis culture.

The researchers aren't claiming that the comet impact caused the climate changes at the time, but Bunch said such an event would have had a significant effect on Earth's climate.

"We're not going to come out and say it did do it, but it's more than a coincidence that the timing happened exactly the time that a lot of climatic conditions occurred and you had the loss of various species," Bunch said.

Still, the researchers predict some skeptics will remain unconvinced that Earth was hit by space rock during the Younger Dryas.

"There's always going to be theoretical and statistical people who would never believe it even if they were there," Bunch said."I think what we're trying to do is open up a vista there for people to examine the data themselves and make their own conclusions."

[ from the paper: ]

We present data from Lake Cuitzeo in central Mexico (19.94 °N,
101.14 °W) in support of evidence for the Younger Dryas
(YD) impact hypothesis, as first presented at the 2007 Meeting
of the American Geophysical Union in Acapulco, Mexico.

There, a consortium of scientists reported geochemical and
mineralogical evidence from multiple terrestrial sites ascribed
to extraterrestrial (ET) impacts and/or airbursts (1).

Their first evidence was the discovery at well-dated Clovis-era
archeological sites in North America
of abundant magnetic spherules (MSp)
and carbon spherules (CSp) in a thin layer (0.5 to 5 cm) called
the Younger Dryas boundary layer (YDB),
dating to 12.9 0.1 kaBP (calibrated, or calendar years)
or 10.9 14C kaBP (radiocarbon years) † (1–3).

The YDB is commonly located directly
beneath or at the base of an organic-rich layer, or “black
mat,” broadly distributed across North America (1).

Later, abundant
nanodiamonds (NDs) were discovered by Kennett et al.
(2, 3) in the YDB layer at numerous locations.

NDs also were detected at the margin of the Greenland Ice Sheet
in a layer that dates to the approximate YD onset (4).

These discoveries led to the hypothesis that one or more fragments
of a comet or asteroid impacted the Laurentide Ice Sheet
and/or created atmospheric airbursts (1)
that initiated the abrupt YD cooling at 12.9 ka,
caused widespread biomass burning, and contributed
to the extinction of Late Pleistocene megafauna and to major
declines in human populations (5).

Some independent workers have been unable to reproduce
earlier YDB results for MSp, CSp, and NDs (6–8), as summarized
in a “News Focus” piece in Science (9), which claims that the
YDB evidence is “not reproducible” by independent researchers.

Refuting this view, multiple groups have confirmed the presence
of abundant YDB markers, although sometimes proposing alternate
hypotheses for their origin.

For example, Mahaney et al. (10–12) independently identified
glassy spherules, CSps, high temperature melt-rocks, shocked quartz,
and a YDB black mat analogue in the Venezuelan Andes.

Those authors conclude the cause was
“either an asteroid or comet event that reached
far into South America” at 12.9 ka.

At Murray Springs, Arizona,
Haynes et al. (13) observed highly elevated concentrations of
YDB MSp and iridium.

Abundances of MSp were 340 × higher
than reported by Firestone et al. (1) and iridium was 34 × higher,
an extraordinary enrichment of 3,000 × crustal abundance.

Those authors stated that their findings are “consistent with their
(Firestone et al.’s) data.”

In YDB sediments from North America and Europe,
Andronikov et al. (2011) reported anomalous enrichments
in rare earth elements (REE) and “overall higher concentrations
of both Os and Ir [osmium and iridium]” that could
“support the hypothesis that an impact occurred shortly before
the beginning of the YD cooling 12.9 ka.” ‡.

Tian et al. (14) observed abundant cubic NDs at Lommel, Belgium,
and concluded that
“our findings confirm … the existence of diamond
nanoparticles also in this European YDB layer.”

The NDs occur within the same layer in which Firestone et al. (1)
found impact related materials.

Similarly, at a YDB site in the Netherlands,
Van Hoesel et al. § observed
“carbon aggregates [consistent with] nanodiamond.”

Recently, Higgins et al. ¶ independently announced
a 4- to 4.5-km-wide YDB candidate crater named Corossol
in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, containing basal sedimentary
fill dating to 12.9 ka.

If confirmed, it will be the largest known
crater in North and South America within the last 35 million years.

Because of the controversial nature of the YD impact debate,
we have examined a diverse assemblage of YDB markers at Lake
Cuitzeo using a more comprehensive array of analytical techniques
than in previous investigations.

In addition, different researchers at
multiple institutions confirmed the key results.

5 Van Hoesel A, Hoek W, Braadbaart F, van der Plicht H, Drury MR,
Nanodiamonds and the Usselo layer, INQUA XVIII, July 21–27, 2011,
Bern Switzerland, #1556.

¶ Higgins MD, et al.,
Bathymetric and petrological evidence for a young (Pleistocene?) 4-km diameter impact crater in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence, Canada,
42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, March 7–11, 2011,
The Woodlands, TX, 1504 LPI Contribution No. 1608.

∥ http://www.calpal.de



.....Comets.

Based upon astrophysical observations and modeling,
Napier (48) proposed that YDB impact markers were produced
when Earth encountered a dense trail of material from a large
already fragmented comet.

His model predicts cluster airbursts
and/or small cratering impacts that could account for the wide
distribution of YD impact debris across more than 10% of the
planet, including Cuitzeo.

Most comets eventually break up as
they transit the inner solar system, and previously unknown fragmented
comets are discovered by space-borne telescopes, such as
the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, on average every 4 y.

As evidence, Earth is bombarded at an average rate of once every 5 d
by one of 72 meteor streams or “showers,” massive clouds of debris
from fragmented comets.

These well-known meteor showers,
e.g., Perseids, Geminids, Taurids, etc., are highly dispersed, but in
the recent geologic past, each stream was far more condensed,
containing many large, potentially destructive fragments.

Currently, the Taurid Complex contains 19 large near-earth Apollo
asteroids, with diameters ranging from approximately 1.5 km
(6063 Jason) to approximately 5 km (4184 Cuno) (48).

None of these currently threatens Earth but may do so in the future.

Impact Dynamics.
Earth has been subjected to a continuous,
although intermittent bombardment by impactors with diameters
ranging from microns to tens of kilometers; velocities range from
approximately 11 km∕s to 73 km∕s with typical values of 17 km∕s
for asteroids and 51 km∕s for comets.

The term “cosmic impact”
evokes images of craters ranging from the 50-kyr-old, 1-km-diameter
Meteor Crater to the 2-billion-year-old, 200-km-diameter
Vredefort crater (49, 50).

For these crater-forming events that
have peak impact pressures in the range of hundreds of GPa,
impact dynamics and shock wave metamorphic effects are well
understood (49, 50).

An ET impact is the only natural mechanism
known to produce major coeval abundances in cubic NDs, lons
daleite, and quench-melted MSp, both of which co-occur in impact
events, including Ries crater and the KPg (39).

Based on hundreds of shock-recovery experiments by one of
the authors of this article (DeCarli), the formation of lonsdaleite
in graphite-bearing gneisses in the Ries, Popigai, and other impact
craters is in complete accord with static high-pressure data
on solid–solid transformation of graphite to lonsdaleite and cubic
NDs (29–31).

However, this transformation does not readily explain
the NDs found at the KPg boundary or in the YDB.

Based on available evidence, it seems unlikely that the YDB NDs
formed by shock compression of terrestrial graphite, and instead,
our preferred mechanism invokes the interaction of an ETobject
with Earth’s atmosphere (49).

If incoming objects are relatively small,
virtually all kinetic energy is transferred to the atmosphere
at high altitudes, creating an air shock with temperatures up to
tens of thousands degrees Kelvin.

These are the familiar shooting stars,
the remains of which may be collected as cosmic dust.

Although shock pressures due to solid–air interaction are modest
at high altitudes, larger objects may be disrupted and fragmented
as pressure builds due to increasing atmospheric density at lower
altitudes.

This breakup is especially likely if the object was loosely
consolidated or low density like a comet.

When an incoming ET
object encounters the atmosphere and breaks apart, individual
pieces rapidly decelerate due to the marked increase in the ratio
of cross-sectional area to mass.

Area of the luminous air shock is
correspondingly increased, with the result that the object appears
to “explode” in a fireball.

For an object traveling at 30 km∕s,
air shock pressure would be
approximately 20 MPa at 20 km altitude,
approximately 170 MPa at 10 km,
and approximately 900 MPa at sea level.

For an air shock of 170 MPa, the pressure exceeds unconfined
compressive strengths of many rocks.

These energetic events are often termed “atmospheric impacts”
to distinguish them from more familiar crater-forming events.

For example, the craterless Tunguska event in Siberia
in 1908 appears to be such an atmospheric impact.

Estimates of energy associated with this event range from
3 to 24 megatons of TNT (51, 52), powerful enough to produce
an air shock that
leveled approximately 80 million trees across 2,000 km^2 of forest.

At a distance of 60 km, the air shock was still able to knock
down a Siberian trader (53), and thermal radiation was intense
enough to char his clothing (49).

Even though the Tunguska atmospheric impact formed no known crater,
it produced MSp (54) and lonsdaleite (55).

Studies of such atmospheric impacts indicate
that Tunguska-sized events up to 24 megatons occur about
once every 220 y (52).

Similar but smaller effects occurred during
the Trinity atomic bomb test in 1945, an aerial burst that also left
no crater yet produced glassy surficial sheet melt, along with
rounded and teardrop-like glassy spherules (56).

Such an atmospheric impact scenario
is also the best explanation for other well known
events with no known craters, including the Libyan Desert
glass field and Dakhleh Oasis glass in Egypt.

In the Australasian
tektite field (780 ka), microspherules and tektites are strewn
across 10–30% of Earth’s surface, producing the world’s largest
ejecta field and yet, there is no known crater.

Wasson (57) proposed
that the Australasian field resulted from an atmospheric
impact by a comet approximately 1 km in diameter, striking
Earth’s atmosphere at an oblique angle.

The amount of kinetic energy transferred during an atmospheric
impact via air shock depends upon the cross-sectional
area of the object, its velocity, and its mass.

Air shock pressure depends upon the velocity of the object
and the density of air at altitude.

Shock front temperature is limited to approximately
20,000 K by dissociation of air molecules ahead of front (58),
and effective duration of the intense thermal pulse can be of
the order of seconds.

Whether an object disintegrates in flight
depends upon its strength, size, shape, velocity, and angle of
entry.

In the case of a comet that is a dusty porous snowball having
little strength, a 20-km-diameter comet traveling at 40 km∕s
would not disintegrate in the Earth’s atmosphere;
the front of the comet would impact Earth before the shock
from atmospheric impact reached the rear of the comet.

However, comets with dimensions
of tens of meters will disintegrate at high altitude.

Weissman (59) estimated that a comet would have to be >350 m
in diameter to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere and form a crater,
depending upon angle, velocity, etc.

Such an event would be at
least 500 × more energetic than the Tunguska event.

YD Impact Model.

Based on current data, we propose the following
preliminary model for formation of the YDB NDs and MSp.

A comet or asteroid, possibly a previously fragmented object that was
once greater than several hundred meters in diameter, entered the
atmosphere at a relatively shallow angle ( > 5° and  < 30°).

Thermal radiation from the air shock reaching Earth’s surface was intense
enough to pyrolyze biomass and melt silicate minerals below the
flight path of the impactor (60).

Pyrolytic products were oxidized,
locally depleting the atmosphere of oxygen, and within microseconds,
residual free carbon condensed into diamond-like crystal
structures, CSp, carbon onions, and aciniform soot.

This involved a CVD-like process similar to diamond-formation
during TNT detonation.

In some cases, carbon onions grew around the NDs and
other nanomaterials.

At the same time, iron-rich and silicate materials
may have melted to form MSp.

Several seconds later, depending on the height of the thermal
radiation source, the air shock arrived.

NDs, MSp, CSp, and other markers were lofted by the
shock-heated air into the upper atmosphere,
where prevailing winds distributed them across the
Northern and Southern Hemispheres.

We suggest that the above
model can account for the observed YDB markers.

.....Summary

Synchronous peaks in multiple YDB markers dating to 12.9 ka
were previously found at numerous sites across North and South
America and in Western Europe.

At Lake Cuitzeo, magnetic impact
spherules, CSps, and NDs form abundance peaks within a
10 cm layer of sediment that dates to the early part of the YD,
beginning at 12.9 ka.

These peaks coincide with anomalous environmental,
geochemical, and biotic changes evident at Lake Cuitzeo
and in other regional records, consistent with the occurrence of
an unusual event.

Analyses of YDB acid-resistant extracts using
STEM, EDS, HRTEM, SAD, FFT, EELS, and EFTEM indicate
that Lake Cuitzeo nanoparticles are dominantly crystalline carbon
and display d-spacings that match various ND allotropes, including
lonsdaleite.

These results are consistent with reports of abundant
NDs in the YDB in North America and Western Europe.

Although the origin of these YDB markers remains speculative,
any viable hypothesis must account for coeval abundance
peaks in NDs, magnetic impact spherules, CSps, and charcoal
in Lake Cuitzeo, along with apparently synchronous peaks at
other sites, spanning a wide area of Earth’s surface.

Multiple hypotheses have been proposed to explain these YDB peaks
in markers, and all but one can be rejected.

For example, the magnetic
impact spherules and NDs cannot result from the influx of
cosmic material or from any known regular terrestrial mechanism,
including wildfires, volcanism, anthropogenesis, or alternatively,
misidentification of proxies.

Currently, only one known event, a cosmic impact,
can explain the diverse, widely distributed
assemblage of proxies.

In the entire geologic record, there are
only two known continent-wide layers with abundance peaks in
NDs, impact spherules, CSps, and aciniform soot, and those
are the KPg impact boundary at 65 Ma and the YDB boundary
at 12.9 ka.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.
Robert Rosenbauer and Pamela Campbell [US Geological Survey (USGS)] performed GC-MS analyses of extractable organic matter from the anomalous interval.
We gratefully acknowledge Ming Xie for assistance with HRTEM analyses at University of Oregon’s CAMCOR transmission electron microscopy facility,
supported by grants from W.M. Keck Foundation,
M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust,
Oregon Nanoscience and Microtechnologies Institute,
and Air Force Research Laboratory (agreement #FA8650-05-1-5041).
R.B.F.’s efforts were supported, in part, by US Department of Energy Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231.
Research by J.P.K. was supported in part by US National Science Foundation grant #OCE-0825322, Marine Geology and Geophysics.
Various parts of the manuscript were improved as a result of collegial reviews by
David Hodell (Cambridge University),
Anthony Irving (University of Washington),
John Barron,
John Hagstrum,
and Scott Starratt (USGS).



10 m broken rock hill with black glazes, W of Rancho Alegre Road, S of
Coyote Trail, W of Hwy 14, S of Santa Fe, New Mexico, tour of 50
photos 1 MB size each via DropBox: Rich Murray 2011.07.28 2011.08.03
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011/08/10-m-broken-rock-hill-with-black-glazes.html
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011/08/35479730-106085926-1865-km-el-top-10-m.html
photos 3-5 of 50
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/92


Rich Murray,
MA Boston University Graduate School 1967 psychology,
BS MIT 1964 history and physics,
254-A Donax Avenue, Imperial Beach, CA 91932
rmforall@gmail.com
            505-819-7388    
Skype audio, video rich.murray11

http://RMForAll.blogspot.com
new primary archive

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/messages

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rmforall/messages

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/messages
group with 117 members, 1,641 posts in a public archive

Thursday, March 01, 2012

SPAWAR has yet to respond re simple error in claims of effects of external high voltage dc fields inside a conducting electrolyte: Rich Murray 2012.03.01

SPAWAR has yet to respond re simple error in claims of effects of external high voltage dc fields inside a conducting electrolyte: Rich Murray 2012.03.01
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2012/03/spawar-has-yet-to-respond-re-simple.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/94


http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2012/03/01/spawar-lenr-research-background-information/#comments

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/NAVY/20120207SPAWAR-JWK-Synopsis-of-Refereed-LENR-Publications.pdf

Synopsis of Refereed LENR Publications
P.A. Mosier-Boss, F.E. Gordon and S. Szpak
SPAWAR Systems Center-Pacific, San Diego, CA 92152
L.P.G. Forsley 1, J.W. Khim
JWK International, Annandale, VA 22003
1  larryforsley@gmail.com

"Subsequent papers examined elemental transmutation, effects of external fields, and measurements of fast neutron energy and their source."


SPAWAR CR-39 single triple track gives neutron energy -- repeats 'external electric field' error in July EPJAP paper, PA Mosier-Boss et al -- L Kowalski re lack of proof of nuclear reactions 2010.06.12: Rich Murray 2010.07.21
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2010/07/spawar-cr-39-single-triple-track-gives.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/56


Extraordinary Error -- no electric field exists inside a conducting liquid in an insulated box with two external charged metal plates, re work by SPAWAR on cold fusion since 2002 -- also hot spots from H and O microbubbles: Rich Murray 2010.02.22
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2010/02/extraordinary-error-no-electric-field.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/42


Rich Murray,
MA Boston University Graduate School 1967 psychology,
BS MIT 1964 history and physics,
254-A Donax Avenue, Imperial Beach, CA 91932
rmforall@gmail.com
                                             505-819-7388    
Skype audio, video rich.murray11

http://RMForAll.blogspot.com
new primary archive

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/messages

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rmforall/messages

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/messages
group with 117 members, 1,641 posts in a public archive

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

W-59 -- God is my Source. God is my strength. Vision is His gift. God is the light in which I see. God is the Mind with which I think. God goes with me wherever I go. Frank J. Ellis: Rich Murray 2012.02.28

W-59 -- God is my Source. God is my strength. Vision is His gift. God is the light in which I see. God is the Mind with which I think. God goes with me wherever I go. Frank J. Ellis: Rich Murray 2012.02.28
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2012/02/w-59-god-is-my-source-god-is-my.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rmforall/message/104

A writer and all his readers collaborate magically and so intimately that terms like telepathy and retrocausation fall far short of what actually transpires and inspires each moment -- for years, Frank,  multidimensionally surfing A Course In Miracles, daily types communions that make the most of the ever evolving readiness of the minds of we sublimely fortunate readers -- so we experience each of us being all of single entire unified creative fractal hyperinfinity -- as we in our global village and our Heaven chorus circle the well in stupendous diversity, drinking and singing as one, gladly accepting fullness of spontaneous power, gratefully letting one another all the  way in...

[ARequiredCourse] W-59 -- God is my Source
fjellis@aol.com via yahoogroups.com
7:08 AM (7 hours ago)

to undisclosed recipients

W-59 -- God is my Source. God is my strength. Vision is His gift. God is the light in which I see. God is the Mind with which I think. God goes with me wherever I go. Frank J. Ellis: Rich Murray 2012.02.28

Father, the idea of separation has so clouded my mind that I did not comprehend the meaning of Source, of Mind, of strength, of What-I-Really-Am with You as the Self Whom You created as me.
You are not separated from me, but my core belief, my nature, the Inner Being which is the Source of what the real me thinks and feels and knows and sees.
The mere concept that I and my Father are one is what I have made totally foreign to my understanding by focusing all of my attention on separation.

Yet, You are still What-I-Really-Am. Nothing is separated from You.
You are the Imagination with which I segment intend and create worlds, my thought-seeing, the limitless power that creates all that I experience.

You are not separated from me, but You are me, my very I am, that I have pinched off and blocked from my awareness of what I am so that I can play a game of being the victim of the images I make.
You are the Source, mighty in the midst of me.
You are the Source of Life.

You are the Life, the living Being, the well spring from which all life, thought, feeling, and seeing flows as my total experience.
Yet, in my childish game of separation, I imagine I have separated a self from my Self, my Source, my Cause, my Life, my Mind.
I could not play my game of requested specialness while I still remembered What-I-Really-Am, so I projected thought images of a separated self, hero of a dream, and pulled down the veil of forgetfulness to cloud my recognition of oneness.

Now I can choose again, to remember the truth of what I am, to be part of and at one with Source instead of a separated self imagined in vain.
The impossible has not happened.
If I separated myself from the Source of Life, I could not be alive.

If I separated myself from the Source of Thought, I could not think.
If I separated myself from the Thoughts which do appear as images, the Word which frames the world, I would be blind, and could not see.
And so I vainly imagined being a self image which walks the valley of death, unaware of the Knowledge of Source, and blind to the gift of Vision.

I so totally focused my attention upon a tiny mad idea specialness, separation, that I made a dream self and dream world image and chose to believe it real.
I remembered not to laugh at the insane idea appearing as a world of chaos, and thus gave no attention to reality.
I focused my attention into the body, the self image I made hero of a dream, a self separated from Life, Mind, and Vision.

In the blindness of the valley of the shadow of death I imagined all things opposite to reality.
My thoughts appear to me as images in my dream, illusions to which I give power over the self image I made.
The images of fear, lack, powerlessness, blame, guilt, and all things opposite to reality seem to attack and hurt and victimize the self image I perceive as me.

Just beyond the drama of this dream, the picturing of a tiny, mad idea at which I did not laugh, is the Knowledge, the truth, the Source of all that is real, the Thoughts which appear as reality, the peace which is free of attacking thoughts and mad ideas and victimizing perceptions.
Just beyond the hell I have made and maintain within my mind as a dream of specialness is the miracle of the light, truth's reality, eternal light of the body of Knowledge, still safe and whole in my own mind.
I have only to make a deliberate decision to lift up my focus of attention from my vain imagining to the Knowledge.

The light is in me, and there is no truth separated from me, outside of me, in the world of false images of this dream of specialness.
All Knowledge, Christ the truth, dwells within me now, and will never leave or forsake me.
I have free will to decide the focus of my attention, the thoughts which I choose as what I see.

Either I focus on a tiny, mad idea, imagining that is all that is, forgetting it could not even exist if it were not for the Source which still gives it life and thought.
Or, I laugh at the mad idea of specialness, of separation, of a dream of Love's opposite, and deliberately decide to focus my attention on remembering the truth, the Knowledge, the miracle just beyond the dream.
The power of choice is my own.

I am still the way, the truth, and the life.
He that believeth in me cannot then be false to himself, believing an idol, a self image of separation, a hero of a dream, can be what he is.
I am the Source, not the delusion.

I have not left Source to become a body born to live a short time in separation and die.
I have simply killed my awareness of the truth that I am still Source, that I may play a childish game of being a self image of specialness separated from all Power, Life, and Energy of Source.
I do it but to myself.

I deceive but myself.
Only I can deny my Self, choosing to be an illusion instead of What-I-Really-Am.
Thankfully, dreaming has no real affect on What-I-Really-AM.
I am still That I AM.

I am still Source, part of Source, at one with Source.
I have no need to feel guilty by believing that I have actually caused my Self to change into my very opposite.
By Grace, nothing that seems to have happened is real because illusions, heroes of dreams, cannot cause reality.

God goes with me wherever I go, the truth of what I really am.
Mind goes with me, surrounding and enfolding the dream, the tiny, mad idea, so infinitesimal that Mind does not even recognize the illusion, an imagining which has no truth or reality, therefore does not exist.
The Light of Knowledge encompasses the insane dream, just beyond the veil of forgetfulness that clouds the remembering.

I have not escaped myself, become separate, nor made the special me real.
If I so choose, I can forgive the tiny, mad idea that believes it is all that is, for it knows not what it does, how it hurts and attacks the Peace of Mind with insanity. Forgiveness heals the Mind of the tiny, mad idea, returning the Mind to Wholeness.

When I no longer have use for madness, I will forgive it from my Mind, let it go, release it, relinquish it, dissolve it into the nothingness from which I imagined it, laugh it away, recognize the absurdity and uselessness of it all.
If I so choose, I can hear the Voice of Love calling me to awaken and resurrect in the Knowledge, the Memory.
I choose to focus on light of truth rising just beyond the dream of death that blinds my awareness of Eternal Life, Source, the Mind in which I live and breathe and have my being.

Thought has not left its Source.
Separation has not occurred.
I and my Father are still one, the Love that surrounds the tiny, mad idea of separation.

If I so choose, I can change my mind, focus my attention on love, make a happy dream.
I elect to prepare my awareness to awaken into recognition of Love's Oneness, the Knowledge just beyond the mad idea.
Just beyond the veil that blinds me is the Light of Knowledge in which I see.

Only my focus separates me.
Only lifting up my focus to the light beyond can free me to remember What-I-Really-Am.
Only I can deny or accept the blessing of truth to replace the hell of delusion.

Free will is all power.
The power of decision is my own.
Knowledge and Memory, or resistance and blockage.

As I think in my heart, so I am.
Recognition of oneness is my salvation.
God is my Source.
I have not left, nor has Source left me, for Oneness is infinite, and separation from infinite eternity is but an impossible self delusion, a vain imagining, a false idea about myself.

Father, I am blessed in the Knowledge of oneness, by forgiving the "knowledge" of separation that condemns me.
I am grateful Love holds me in Grace, safe from all imagined harm, forever within Mind where no harm can come nigh my dwelling place.
I am thankful all that I thought happened has not occurred, was but a dream to delude the self image I pretended to be.
I appreciate the resurrection, the second coming of life and truth in my attention.
Only I can deny or invite the light of Knowledge to rise up in my awareness.


%%%%%
59 in 25 words

I tried to define what seeing is.
I am no mind apart from His.
Now I understand.
Love is the light in which I see.